| Subject: | This way to test the performance is incomplete because you ca... |
|---|
| Summary: | Package rating comment |
|---|
| Messages: | 2 |
|---|
| Author: | Ralf Mike Pretzlaw |
|---|
| Date: | 2009-03-11 10:32:05 |
|---|
| Update: | 2009-03-12 11:26:04 |
|---|
| |
|
|
Ralf Mike Pretzlaw rated this package as follows:
| Utility: | Sufficient |
|---|
| Consistency: | Good |
|---|
| Examples: | I am not sure |
|---|
|
|
| |
1. This way to test the performance is incomplete because you ca... |
|
Reply |
|
|
Ralf Mike Pretzlaw | 2009-03-11 10:32:05 |
This way to test the performance is incomplete because you can't calculate the time of the overhead for each script.
Even to include this script has a greater overhead than implementing it iterative. |
| |
2. Re: This way to test the performance is incomplete because you c |
|
Reply |
|
|
sanjeev | 2009-03-12 11:26:04 - In reply to message 1 from Ralf Mike Pretzlaw |
Thanks for your comment. In next version I will improve it.
Thanks, |
|
Stumble It!
Bookmark in del.icio.us
