| Subject: | the example seems broken |
|---|
| Summary: | Package rating comment |
|---|
| Messages: | 4 |
|---|
| Author: | max costa |
|---|
| Date: | 2008-11-18 21:01:42 |
|---|
| Update: | 2008-11-20 02:32:21 |
|---|
| |
|
|
max costa rated this package as follows:
| Utility: | Good |
|---|
| Consistency: | Good |
|---|
| Documentation: | Sufficient |
|---|
| Examples: | Sufficient |
|---|
|
|
 max costa - 2008-11-18 21:01:42 the example seems broken
 Reynier Blanco - 2008-11-18 22:08:40 - In reply to message 1 from max costaLamento la molesti a lo que tenia el ejemplo era que le faltaban los // del comentario :
Whit this new method ...
max costa - 2008-11-20 00:51:20 - In reply to message 2 from Reynier Blancosorry, I wasn't intend to be nasty. You did a great work!
But the example file has to be fixed. The one I get (maybe you changed something in the meantime) has a simple error at the top (wrong include name) and non exists class call at the end. It's simple fixing but the example as is cannot work and this is the reason of the insufficent. For all the rest I surely change mind because it's a great work and really useful!
By the way I cannot understand your last message because of the language, I'm sorry.
Reynier Blanco - 2008-11-20 02:32:21 - In reply to message 3 from max costaSorry for de language of the before message. I apologize for the error of the include and I inform that it is already updated and functional
|
